Quantification of Motor Ability Components in Response to High Intensity Interval Training and Moderate Intensity Continuous Training among College Women Athletes

Authors

  • V. Lakshmi Prabha1 , I. John Parthiban2

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37506/ijphrd.v11i7.10210

Keywords:

High-Intensity Interval Training, Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training,

Abstract

Background: Motor skills are learned sequences of movements that are combined to produce a smooth,

efficient action in order to master a particular task. Arm strength and flexibility are basic essential need

for all sports and games. Sports training are the basic form of an athlete’s training. It is the preparation

systematically organized with the help of exercises, which in fact is a pedagogically organized process of

controlling an athlete’s development.

Purpose: The purpose of the study was to quantification of motor ability components in response to high

intensity interval training and moderate-intensity continuous training among college women athletes.

Method: Forty five (N=45) women athletes were selected as subjects. They were divided randomly into

three groups of fifteen each i.e., (n=15) Group-I underwent high-intensity interval training (HIIT), Group-II

underwent moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) and Group-III acted as control group (CG). The

training period was limited to three days per week for twelve weeks. Among the motor ability components

arm strength and flexibility were selected as dependent variables. Arm strength was measured through push

ups test and flexibility was assessed through sit & reach test. All the subjects were tested prior to and

immediately after the experimental period on the selected dependent variable. The data obtained from the

experimental groups and control group before and after the experimental period were statistically analyzed

with Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). Whenever the ‘F’ ratio for adjusted post test means was found to

be significant, the Scheffe’s Post hoc test was applied to determine the paired mean differences. The level of

confidence was fixed at 0.05 level for all the cases.

Results: High-intensity interval training (HIIT) was found to be better than the Moderate-intensity continuous

training (MICT) and Control group in developing arm strength and flexibility.

Author Biography

  • V. Lakshmi Prabha1 , I. John Parthiban2

    1 Ph.D Research Scholar, 2Director of Physical Education, H. H. The Rajah’s College (Auto), (Affiliated to

    Bharathidasan University, Tiruchirappalli), Pudukkottai, Tamilnadu, India

Downloads

Published

2020-07-30

How to Cite

Quantification of Motor Ability Components in Response to High Intensity Interval Training and Moderate Intensity Continuous Training among College Women Athletes. (2020). Indian Journal of Public Health Research & Development, 11(7), 945-949. https://doi.org/10.37506/ijphrd.v11i7.10210